Biden administration’s stance on multilateralism not clear yet

9

While the new administration may have more multilateralists who support world trade, it is not if it will be any keener than the current one on having the United States throw its trade doors wide open, or join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) trade pact, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

The attitude of the Trump administration so far, he added, has been that trade is a win-lose proposition: “If I have a trade surplus with you, that is good for me. If I have a trade deficit with you, that is bad for me.”

But trade is not like that, PM Lee said yesterday at a virtual mee-ting associated with the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) grouping. “Trade is win-win – I may have a surplus with you, I have a deficit with somebody else, but it does not matter as long as overall, it balances out.”

But that has not been the view of the Trump administration, which “is still in charge until Jan 20”, he noted, referencing the date when Mr Joe Biden will be installed as US president.

“I do not think that they are likely to change their position at this late stage, but we will have to see how the new Biden administration plays it.”

PM Lee was responding to moderator and Singapore Business Federation chief executive Ho Meng Kit at the Apec CEO Dialogues. Mr Ho had asked how Apec would be affected by the US election results and the signing of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the world’s largest trade pact.

Both the CPTPP and RCEP are seen as building blocks of a much larger free trade vision spanning the Pacific Ocean – The Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific, which Apec member economies had alluded to as early as 2004.

One reason for the slow progress in Apec, PM Lee said, is that the US wants to deal with issues bilaterally, rather than on a multilateral basis with multiple partners together in a group.

And while the Biden administration may be more supportive of the World Trade Organisation and Apec, much still depends on domestic , he added.

“Once the restrictions are in, it is a very delicate matter rethinking your position in deciding whether you want to go back to where you were, or how do you move forward.”

He called the RCEP, which was signed last Sunday, a “big step forward” and that it sends an important signal that countries in Asia do want to deepen regional integration, free up trade further, and are determined to work together and prosper together as a group.

While there has been disappointment over India’s withdrawal last year, it is the hope that one day, it will rejoin, PM Lee added.

“Because it makes strategic sense for (India) and I think in the long term, it makes economic sense for them too. But they have political considerations, and I can understand that.”

India had trade deficits with 11 of the 15 RCEP members and had feared the deal would result in cheap manufacturing and agricultural products flooding its domestic market.

U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS

PM Lee said attitudes in both the US and China have hardened a lot in recent years.

Many in the US see China as a strategic threat, while China thinks the US is out to thwart its development and rise.

But he expressed hope that the Biden administration will take “a more coherent, systematic approach – one which will take into account a broader range of US interests, not just a trade balance, but also their overall relationship with China and the overall interest which the US has in the Asia-Pacific and in the world”.

And the US will need to be seen as setting the standard, showing the way and playing a leading role as the most powerful country in the world, he added.

“Taking care of America’s interests does not mean having to ride roughshod over other countries’ interests,” said PM Lee.

He also made the point that Apec is a forum where issues can be discussed and nations can come together and work things out.

The digital economy is one such area, he said, citing the need to standardise rules and introduce appropriate regulations to facilitate information flows.

Travel is also important, and countries need agreements on how to have green lanes and travel bubbles, how to test for and trace the virus, and be able to adjust the rules when circumstances change.

PM Lee added: “For example, if you have a travel bubble with somebody, and then I have new cases pop up or he has new cases pop up – what do we do?”

There must be some way to press the pause button until the situation stabilises again and things can be reopened, he said.

“These are all things which need to be discussed, and I hope will be discussed in Apec.”

Comments are closed.