HONG KONG – In late January, staff of Cathay Pacific Airways were invited to an online meeting with senior management. It was supposed to be a debrief on the airline’s financial performance, but when the floor was opened to questions, the first was whether Hong Kong’s flag carrier would be taken over by its state-owned shareholder Air China.
Clearly annoyed, Cathay chief executive officer Augustus Tang dismissed the notion, according to a recording heard by Bloomberg News. He called it “really sensational and hypothetical” and “grossly untrue.”
The audience of pilots, flight attendants and other employees was unconvinced. That the subject was even raised reflects the level of anxiety and distrust at the 75-year-old airline, which has gone from being a symbol of Hong Kong’s openness to one of its decline.
Made a cautionary tale for businesses that didn’t rein in their staff during 2019’s anti-China protests, Cathay has since been hammered by some of the most stringent travel curbs in the world, as Hong Kong’s government strives to toe Beijing’s isolationist line on walling out the virus.
The restrictions have decimated Cathay’s passenger business, leaving it more reliant on cargo operations for income. The airline, due to report annual results on Wednesday, is flying at about 2 per cent of 2019 capacity and is bleeding as much as HK$1.5 billion (S$262 million) a month.
Cathay’s second-largest investor with a 29.99 per cent share, Air China can’t raise its stake without bidding for the entire company, thanks to a 2006 shareholding agreement. Still, such is the level of suspicion among staff at the storied carrier – especially when it comes to Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam’s Beijing-backed administration – that speculation persists about the government’s plans for the airline, according to interviews with multiple current and former Cathay workers.
By far the city’s dominant airline, Cathay has long been a crucial cog in Hong Kong’s functioning as a financial centre and Asian transit hub. But the sheen has come off the company, as it has Hong Kong, which is no longer regarded as the freewheeling, global metropolis it was. The protests and Covid restrictions put paid to that. People are leaving in their thousands.
One reason questions are raised about Cathay’s destiny is that it is still majority-owned by Swire Pacific, a two century-old British conglomerate with roots in the colonial era. That’s something that could still rankle with the mainland and has stoked the talk of a takeover.
Cathay spokesman Andy Wong said there’s been no change to the airline’s shareholding structure. While it faces an “incredibly challenging environment,” Cathay has confidence in Hong Kong’s long-term status as a global aviation hub and the carrier’s place at the centre of that. Swire remains a committed long-term shareholder, spokesman James Tong said. Air China didn’t respond to an email for comment.
The Hong Kong government has a 6.1 per cent stake and two observers on the board following a HK$39 billion rescue plan in 2020 that chairman Patrick Healy, who is also a director at Air China, said saved the airline from collapse.
Yet despite its hand in the company, Ms Lam’s administration hasn’t been an ally for Cathay.
In addition to the Covid curbs – which at one point saw travelers effectively banned from the US and UK, and three-week hotel quarantines the norm – the government has publicly criticized staff and management. It’s even threatened to take legal action against Cathay after two workers broke quarantine rules and were subsequently blamed for sparking the Omicron outbreak that’s become Hong Kong’s worst of the pandemic.
The Hong Kong government defended its actions in an emailed response. It said it was committed to upholding the city’s international aviation reputation. However, it did not address concerns from Cathay staff that its actions were detrimental to the airline’s ability stay in business.