NEW YORK – Whatever else it signifies, and it may not be much, considering what happened the last time stocks did this, Thursday’s (Sept 3) plunge in US equities was vindication for bearish strategists whose voices had been getting louder.
Scepticism looked smart with big technology companies posting the biggest drop since March.
Warnings that valuations were out of control and investors would pay for their euphoria have been swirling around for weeks amid a stretch in which the S&P 500 went 30 sessions without a 1 per cent decline.
On Thursday, it fell 3.5 per cent, while the Nasdaq 100 lost 5.2 per cent.
While the correction was abrupt, it was overdue given how crowded the megacap tech trade had become, according to Wells Fargo Investment’s Sameer Samana.
And with market attention likely to turn to the upcoming US presidential election after the holiday weekend, traders are likely trimming risk, he said.
“While there was no one trigger, there’s probably some nervousness and squaring up of positions heading into a long weekend,” said Samana, the firm’s senior global market strategist.
“Given the nice run, you could even describe it as profit-taking.”
To be sure, that’s all it was on June 11, when the S&P 500 lost 6 per cent. Its return since then is about 15 per cent, even with Thursday’s dramatics.
Tech has powered the S&P 500’s almost 55 per cent rebound from its March lows. The dynamic kicked into overdrive in recent weeks after Apple and Tesla’s stock splits caused the shares to surge.
Prior to Thursday, the Nasdaq’s 41 per cent year-to-date gain exceeded the American equity benchmark’s advance by about 30 percentage points. That’s pushed the relative strength of the Nasdaq over the S&P 500 to the highest on record.
“At some point, you’re bound to see some profit-taking and re-positioning within portfolios,” said Adam Phillips, director of portfolio strategy at EP Wealth Advisors.
“It’s hard to know what the final straw was for investors, but the selloff shouldn’t come as much of a surprise. It was quite evident that areas of the market were overextended.”
The warning signs were there. Implied volatility on the Nasdaq 100 has been rising even as the index rallied – a rare alignment that strategists warned would end painfully, as booming demand for call options forced dealers to recalibrate their hedges.
But if that so-called “short gamma” hedging lifted stocks, logically it should also be capable of exacerbating moves the other way. When shares fall, market makers are likely to unwind hedges at an increasing speed, spurring more losses.
The equity volatility “complex is acting ‘broken’ and indicative that ‘something’s gotta give’”, Charlie McElligott, a cross-asset strategist at Nomura Securities, wrote in a note Thursday.
“It all adds up to feel like a recipe for tears, i.e. ‘real’ potential for a Nasdaq/SPX -6 per cent to -8 per cent single day in the next 1m-2m time frame.”
While betting against tech bubble in the 2000s was painful for those who were early, Thursday’s rout is an opportunity to rebalance away from the sector, according to BTIG’s Julian Emanuel. He’s bullish on bank stocks, which are still nursing losses of over 18 per cent in 2020.
“If you have too much technology in your portfolio, now is the time to start taking a little bit of it off with winners, and reallocate to financials,” Mr Emanuel, chief equity and derivatives strategist at BTIG, said on Bloomberg Television and Radio.
“We think the Fed has changed the game and financials will ultimately lead the market higher in 2021.”